• Home
  • About
    • Our People
    • Mission and Funding
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
    • Equity Resources
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • AEC Fellowship
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
    • MassCEC Empower Grant
Applied Economics Clinic
  • Home
  • About
    • Our People
    • Mission and Funding
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
    • Equity Resources
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • AEC Fellowship
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
    • MassCEC Empower Grant

Deep Water Cooling Systems Provide an Alternative to Traditional Air Conditioning

With climate change leading to record summer temperatures, access to cooled spaces can mean the difference between life and death for many. However, air-conditioning can be prohibitively expensive and is energy—and greenhouse-gas emission—intensive. As of 2018, cooling systems accounted for roughly 10 percent of global energy consumption and 12 percent of residential energy expenditure in the United States. As an alternative, some areas have invested in deep water cooling systems (DWCS) as a low energy way of keeping buildings cool. DWCS use sea or lake water as a coolant rather than relying on electric-powered AC systems. DWCS work by running a closed loop of water through the buildings being cooled. The water chills the buildings and absorbs excess heat. The water then is cycled through a cooling station where it is rechilled by sea/lake water that has been pumped to the surface. The sea/lake water is either returned to the sea/lake or continues on to be processed in desalination centers or drinking water treatment facilities.

Toronto is currently home to the world’s largest deep lake water cooling system—the largest deep seawater cooling system has just launched in Tahiti. Launched in 2004, Toronto now used DWCS to cool over 100 buildings in the downtown area, including Toronto General Hospital, City Hall, and the Scotiabank Arena. Due to its popularity, the system has nearly reached capacity and Enwave, the company that runs it, has committed to a (CAN) $100 million expansion, adding a fourth pipe to the three that already pump water in from Lake Ontario. Enwave estimates that the system saves 90,000 mega-watt hours of electricity annually—enough to power a 25,000-person town—and 220 million gallons of water annually when compared to traditional cooling systems that rely on evaporation to dissipate heat.

DWCS save energy and reduce emissions, but they are not without their drawbacks. The initial cost of installing a DWCS system is high. Toronto’s system initially cost Enwave (CAN) $170 million to install and the Honolulu Seawater Air Conditioning LLC, after spending 16 years and $25 million obtaining regulatory approval, recently ended their DWCS plans due to an increase in estimated construction costs from $275 million to $400 million. Location and geography are also critical. The body of water used needs to be deep enough to ensure a permanently cold bottom level. Much of the ocean shelf along eastern United States, for example, is too shallow for deep water cooling. The amount of water that can be safely withdrawn for cooling also varies. While large bodies of water such as the great lakes and the ocean are effectively limitless as a cooling resource, smaller water bodies can only have so much water withdrawn before the returning warmed water effects the overall temperature. In the locations where it is feasible, however, deep water cooling can serve as an energy efficient way to cool a single large building, college campus, or a whole downtown area.

Claire Marie James

Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Claire Marie James
Thursday 12.09.21
Posted by Guest User
 

Exxon given negative rating on racial justice actions

A recent report by corporate accountability advocacy group As You Sow rated Exxon Mobil last out of all S&P 500 companies on measures of racial justice. The San Antonio based company received an overall score of negative 23 percent out of a possible 100 percent:

  • Zero percent for Racial Justice Statement, Corporate Responsibility, DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) Department, and External Actions, meaning they took no actions in any of those categories.

  • 7 percent on its disclosure of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion data, earning 2 out of a possible 27 points within that category.

Within the category of Environmental justice:

  • Zero for Acknowledgement of Environmental Justice.

  • Negative 5 for Abides by Environmental Regulations.

  • Negative 6 for Environmental Fines and Penalties.

  • Negative 2 for Adverse Effects to BIPOC Communities, for a total score of negative 13 out of 16, or negative 81 percent.

As You Sow’s report listed Exxon as having over 100 environmental regulation violations since 2015 and found that, more generally, companies with a low environmental score were often repeat offenders. As of March 2021, a federal judge ordered Exxon to pay a $14.25 million fine for 16,386 violations of the federal Clean Air Act between 2005 and 2013—this averages out to approximately 5 to 6 violations per day at less than $900 per violation—in their flagship Baytown, Texas refinery alone.

Residents living near Exxon’s Beaumont, Texas refinery face elevated health risks likely due to the 135 toxic chemicals, including carcinogens, released in the refining process. The risk of cancer for those living in this historically black neighborhood is 54 in a million, much higher than the zero-to-one in a million national average. The local community suffers from elevated health issues related to their elevated exposure to pollutants. The Beaumont refinery is the third largest polluter in the United States. The top two polluters are Exxon’s Baton Rouge and Baytown facilities, respectively. Similar to Beaumont, the Baton Rouge refinery is located in a predominantly black neighborhood that suffers from elevated health risks.

Overall, the energy sector had the lowest average score, 3 percent, compared to Consumer Staples at 21 percent and Materials at 9 percent. By defining specific racial justice actions, As You Sow provides companies with a potential road map for improving their social impact and consumers and stakeholders with information on and a methodology for assessing company actions.

Claire Marie James

Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Claire Marie James
Monday 10.25.21
Posted by Guest User