• Home
  • About
    • Our People
    • Mission and Funding
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
    • Equity Resources
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • AEC Fellowship
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
    • MassCEC Empower Grant
Applied Economics Clinic
  • Home
  • About
    • Our People
    • Mission and Funding
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
    • Equity Resources
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • AEC Fellowship
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
    • MassCEC Empower Grant

Integrating Energy and Environment into Biden’s Infrastructure Plan

In March 2021, AEC published a blog titled What is missing from Biden’s Climate Plan?, which focused on a $2 trillion plan to tackle climate change. The Administration’s initial commitment while campaigning was to leverage $1.7 trillion over the next ten years into climate and environmental justice. In November 2021, President Biden passed a major $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill into law (originally the $2.25 trillion American Jobs Plan). However, a second proposal, known as the Build Back Better bill invests an additional $1.75 trillion into more sectors, including environment and climate. The Bill was passed by the House of Representatives but remains to be voted on by the Senate; the Democrats’ hope to pass it before the end of December. While the American Jobs Plan focused on improving infrastructure at large—like roads, bridges, airports, and water systems—each component can integrate clean energy and decarbonization strategies, beyond what the Build Back Better Bill is proposing.

Biden’s infrastructure bills, along with his general federal policy plan, has had an emphasis on environmental justice.  A press release from the White House emphasized that President Biden was committed to boosting clean energy jobs in order to strengthen resilience and advance environmental justice as a part of his two-part plan. In additional, President Biden signed an executive order his first two weeks into office highlighting the importance of incorporating environmental justice into the work of all agencies, and more recently, in July 2021, the administration announced Justice40, a government-wide initiative to bring clean energy investment to environmental justice communities.

While the American Jobs Plan, now law, does not specifically call upon Justice40, the law integrates environmental justice principles into its energy specific goals. The law dedicates $100 billion towards renovating the electric grid, though cost estimates range closer to $400-$500 billion. Components include building a more resilient electric transmission system, generating clean energy jobs (especially within underserved communities), and fully decommissioning orphan oil and gas wells along with abandoned coal mines. Non-explicit electric grid components that still integrate energy and environment include a push to retrofit homes, commercial and federal buildings, and veterans’ hospitals to make them more energy efficient.

In contrast, the Build Back Better Plan, yet to be made law, mentions Justice40 and has a more specific focus on the energy sector. The plan proposes a $440.2 billion investment into environment and climate, and includes a massive push for renewable electricity tax credits. Other components include domestic building of clean energy technology (citing specifically wind turbine blades, solar panels, and electric cars) in order to stimulate jobs, a Clean Energy and Sustainability Accelerator with a focus on disadvantaged communities (under the Justice40 initiative), and investment in coastal restoration, forest management, and soil conservation.

In April 2021 the administration announced a target 50-52 percent reduction from 2005 levels in net greenhouse gas pollution for the entire country by 2030. Getting there will require actions like the American Jobs Plan and Build Back Better Plan, with integrations of the Justice40 initiative across the board, to ensure a sustainable, just, and green transition.

Myisha Majumder
Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Myisha Majumder
Thursday 12.16.21
Posted by Guest User
 

No Idling Allowed: Electric Vehicle Policies and Development

Filmmaker and environmentalist Chris Paine’s Who Killed the Electric Car?—a retrospective documentary released in 2006 on the rise and, at the time, fall of the electric vehicle (EV) industry in the early 2000s—raised some controversial points that are still relevant to today’s EV market. Paine makes the claim that General Motors, one of the largest car manufacturers in the country, intentionally sabotaged its original EV model, the EV1, out of fear of market repercussions. General Motor’s main argument for discontinuing the EV1 was a common myth in the automobile industry: Low customer demand for all-electric vehicles make EVs a “worthless” niche to pursue as a company. But what if producers had an incentive to expand manufacturing to include EVs?   

Soon after President Biden took office, he signed an executive order to replace all government vehicles (include USPS) with electric vehicles. Since then, President Biden has made efforts to increase electric vehicle charging infrastructure with large funding opportunities from the Department of Energy, among other government agencies. In the last month, President Biden pitched his $174 billion EV proposal in the heart of the car manufacturing industry in the United States—Michigan. In addition, Senate passed a $3.5 trillion budget framework on August 11, 2021, that includes funding to make EVs more affordable for consumers, including a public charging network and financial incentives.

EV Parking.jpg

Lowering greenhouse gas emissions relies not only on making EV charging infrastructure available but also on getting more EVs on the road. Consumer Reports analyzed EV production plans by vehicle producer, including big names like Ford Motor Company, Volvo, Honda, and General Motors. Among its findings: Jaguar plans to be all-electric by 2025, the United Kingdom will ban diesel- and gas-powered cars affective 2030, and General Motors will become completely carbon neutral by 2040. Individual companies setting targets, however, will not be enough for a timely fleet turnover—the International Energy Agency determined that governments will need to accelerate decarbonization policies to meet their climate goals, which will involve extensive upgrades to the transportation sector.

While EVs make up 4.6 percent of car sales around the world, and more than 20 countries have electrification targets or planned bans on internal combustion engines, in the United States there are no federal targets for EV sales. Instead, states have taken the lead and incentivize businesses and consumers to make the switch from conventional internal combustion engines to hybrid and battery-operated EVs. As consumer demand for EVs increases over time, auto manufacturers must abandon the idea of EVs being a “small niche market” to promote turnover of combustion engines, facilitate meeting climate goals, and to achieve the target of half of all new domestic vehicle sales being electric by the end of this decade.

Sagal
Alisalad
Assistant Researcher

Myisha Majumder
Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Sagal Alisalad, Myisha Majumder
Friday 08.13.21
Posted by Guest User
 

The Urban Heat Island Effect and Equity

A recent study published in Nature Communications found that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) are disproportionately in census tracts with higher heat island intensity. Heat islands are defined as areas that experience higher temperatures than the surrounding areas. This is often in urbanized areas with large infrastructure, like buildings and roads, that lead to an increased sunlight intensity. In contrast, areas that are more suburban or rural have more green space, which helps with cooling temperatures.

Bloomberg’s CityLab reported that access to green space in cities is directly related to income and higher education, both of which are, in turn, associated with an increase in green space. The Nature Communications study found that in 169 of the 175 urban areas analyzed disparities in heat island effects were dependent on race. A higher exposure to heat leads to drastic health outcome, which already disproportionately impact marginalized communities. Heat impacts pre-existing conditions, like heart and lung disease, diabetes, and asthma.

anthony-delanoix-VDS8ASoyzjw-unsplash.jpg

In the hottest parts of Boston and its adjacent cities (Chelsea, Everett, and Somerville), daily temperatures can be 20 to 50 degrees hotter than nearby suburban areas that have more tree and vegetation coverage—like Melrose, Arlington, Newton, and Brookline. Building colors and types of infrastructure also play a major role in the heat island effect: dense urban areas with an aging housing stock and multi-story buildings, often made of brick and stone, retain heat collected throughout the day. While replacing asphalt with rubberized surfaces on children’s playgrounds is beneficial in preventing injury, black or dark blue playground surfaces can heat up to about 96 degrees on a sunny day in the mid-70s. While some cities are investing in long-term cooling plans, there are some setbacks. For instance, the City of Chelsea planted 2,000 trees between 2013 and 2017, but roughly 30 percent of the trees died within a year of planting. This is partially due to methane gas distribution system leaks nearby the affected trees.

Urban heat islands are often a result of racist systemic practices, such as redlining (where neighborhoods and communities are denied services as a result of racially discriminatory practices) and underfunding of marginalized communities. A study in the journal Climate found that 94 percent of the cities studied had higher land-surface temperatures in formerly redlined areas compared to non-redlined areas. To this day, Boston is still quite segregated, and like other cities in the United States, urban heat islands are strongly correlated with public disinvestment and systemic racism.

sagal.jpeg

Sagal
Alisalad
Research Assistant

Myisha Majumder
Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Sagal Alisalad, Myisha Majumder
Wednesday 07.14.21
Posted by Guest User
 

Juneteenth – Continued Support for Racial Justice

Last year, during the height of a pandemic that disproportionately impacted marginalized populations, a wave of calls and actions against racial inequity was renewed. AEC stood in solidarity with demands for racial justice then and continues to do so now. Though the movement has sustained momentum, it is imperative that we recognize not only the continued injustices committed in the last year, but that these injustices have deep systemic roots.

Juneteenth, a holiday marking the official emancipation of slaves on June 19, 1865, was declared a state holiday in Massachusetts last year, after widespread calls for concrete recognition. Other states had done the same prior to 2020, including Hawaii, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Beyond this, many private corporations have incorporated Juneteenth into their calendar, either through giving a day off or taking a moment of pause to recognize the painful racial history of the United States.

Environmental justice and racial justice go hand in hand. Black communities disproportionately suffer from several environmental harms including proximity to industrial facilities, power plants, and hazardous sites, exposure to emissions, and the effects of natural disasters. Due to these disparities, the Environmental Justice Movement is rooted in black history.

This Juneteenth, we at AEC want to recognize the Black Americans that are fighting for environmental justice across the United States. A recent web article by the global environmental organizing campaign Greenpeace calls out eight Black activists and their organizations for their work fighting environmental injustices:

·      Savonala “Savi” Horne: Executive Director of the Land Loss Prevention Project, an organization that provides legal assistance to Black farmers and landowners in North Carolina in danger of losing their land.

·      Chantel Johnson: Founder of Off Grid in Color (OGIC), an organization that fosters self-sufficiency in communities of color.  

·      Tanya Fields: Founder of the Black Feminist Project which centers on food justice, and economic development for underserved woman and youth of color.  

·      Rue Mapp: Founder of Outdoor Afro, Rue works to provide Black communities with opportunities to connect with nature and the black history tied to natural areas in the United States.

·      Christopher Bradshaw: Founder of Dreaming Out Loud, an organization that strives to improve economic opportunity and access to education and a healthy environment for marginalized communities. 

·      Peggy Shepard: Co-Founder of WE ACT for Environmental Justice which addresses environmental protection and environmental health policy, particularly for low-income communities and communities of color.

·      Jeaninne Kayembe: Co-Founder of The Urban Creators, an organization that utilizes food, art, and education to nurture resilience in the local community.  

·      Omar Freilla: Founder of Green Worker Cooperatives, Omar works with worker-owned green businesses to support the local economy while prioritizing democracy and environmental justice.

Our thanks to these activists and to BIPOC-led organizations for driving campaigns to depend environmental resources and the human communities that live in and rely on them. For more resources on the intersection of equity, race, the BLM Movement, and the environment, visit our resources page.

 

Tanya Stasio Research Assistant

Myisha Majumder
Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Tanya Stasio, Myisha Majumder
Thursday 06.17.21
Posted by Guest User
 

Royal Dutch Shell Ordered to Cut Emissions

Royal Dutch Shell, a global oil company based in Europe, is one of the most profitable and largest companies in the world. In early February 2021, Royal Dutch Shell announced an update to its net-zero emissions strategy, breaking down key goals and facts about the company, including that the Company’s total carbon emissions had peaked in 2018, along with oil production peaking in 2019. The net-zero emissions goal was announced in 2020, with a goal of achieving a 45 percent reduction by 2035 and carbon neutrality by 2050. The February update provided incremental targets to 2050, using 2016 as a base year. Other components to the update included increasing carbon, capture, and storage capacity and increasing carbon offsets, a measure our blog series has covered before.

shell.png

In 2018, thousands of Dutch citizens, along with seven environmental and human rights organizations filed a case asking the Hague District Court to order Royal Dutch Shell to cut emissions in line the Paris Climate Agreement; Shell is responsible for about 1 percent of annual global emissions and invests heavily in oil and gas. Last week, the Court ordered that Royal Dutch Shell cut its net carbon emissions by 45 percent by 2030, compared to 2019 levels. The decision followed after the Court determined that Royal Dutch Shell’s current emission reduction plans were not sufficient; the ruling greatly speeds up Royal Dutch Shell’s public goals and makes them more concrete and actionable.

Not only did the ruling speed up the timeline for the company’s emissions reduction goal by 5 years, but it also changed the baseline year to 2019, likely requiring larger reductions than the original 2016 baseline.

The Court did not order any explicit steps towards achieve this goal, allowing Royal Dutch Shell freedom in planning its shifted pathway. Without rules to guide the Company in reaching the new goal, it is possible Royal Dutch Shell may exploit loopholes in the ruling. Despite this flexibility, Royal Dutch Shell noted its disappointment and intent to appeal the decision in a media announcement on the day of the ruling.

All in all, this unprecedented ruling sets the stage for future legal action against major polluters.

Tanya Stasio Research Assistant

myishaphoto.jpeg

Myisha Majumder
Research Assistant


This is a part of the AEC Blog series

tags: Tanya Stasio, Myisha Majumder
Thursday 06.03.21
Posted by Guest User