• Home
  • About
    • Mission and Funding
    • Our People
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Areas of Expertise
    • Publications
    • Testimonials
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
  • Seminars
    • Upcoming Seminars
    • Seminar Archive
  • Resources
    • Maps Archive
    • Equity Resources
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
  • Work With Us
  • Energy School
Applied Economics Clinic
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Funding
    • Our People
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Areas of Expertise
    • Publications
    • Testimonials
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
  • Seminars
    • Upcoming Seminars
    • Seminar Archive
  • Resources
    • Maps Archive
    • Equity Resources
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
  • Work With Us
  • Energy School

Testimony on Enbridge Gas Utah’s Application

Client: Utah Clean Energy (UCE) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)

Author: Elizabeth A Stanton, PhD

October 2026

On behalf of Utah Clean Energy (UCE) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD prepared expert testimony before the Public Service Commission of Utah in response to the Application filed in Docket No. 26-057-16 by Enbridge Gas Utah seeking approval to include properties associated with the Piceance Development (“Piceance III Properties”) as Wexpro II properties pursuant to the Wexpro II Agreement. Dr. Stanton’s testimony raises concerns about the Company’s planned gas purchases associated with the proposed Piceance III acquisition, including the risks associated with production volumes significantly exceeding existing transportation capacity and selling excess gas through off-system sales, which exposes Enbridge customers to serious risks including market volatility and potential negative cost impacts. Dr. Stanton urges the Commission to require a thorough analysis of customer costs and benefits, more detailed load forecasting, and an extended procedural schedule to allow sufficient time for discovery and independent expert review.

Link to Testimony

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Gas distribution and supply planning, Gas system infrastructure impacts and costs, Gas network expansion assessment
Thursday 10.22.26
Posted by Liz Stanton