• Home
  • About
    • Mission and Funding
    • Our People
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Areas of Expertise
    • Publications
    • Testimonials
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
  • Seminars
    • Upcoming Seminars
    • Seminar Archive
  • Resources
    • Maps Archive
    • Equity Resources
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
  • Work With Us
  • Energy School
Applied Economics Clinic
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Funding
    • Our People
    • 990 Filings
    • Governance and Disclosure Statements
  • Our Work
    • Areas of Expertise
    • Publications
    • Testimonials
  • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Pro Bono Fund
    • Pro Bono Fund
    • Donate
  • Seminars
    • Upcoming Seminars
    • Seminar Archive
  • Resources
    • Maps Archive
    • Equity Resources
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
  • Work With Us
  • Energy School

Massachusetts Building Sector Model and Policy Analysis

Client: Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs

Author: Elizabeth A Stanton, PhD, Sagal Alisalad, Joshua R. Castigliego, Bryndis Woods, PhD, Tanya Stasio, PhD, Jordan Burt, PhD, and Elisabeth Seliga

August 2026

On behalf of the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (MA EEA), AEC staff collaborated with Introba and Massachusetts Institute of Technology to develop the Massachusetts Building Energy Scenario Tool (MassBEST), a flexible modeling platform that integrates building-level energy modeling, adoption and propensity modeling, policy representation, and electric grid impact analysis to support the Commonwealth’s decarbonization decision-making. In this project, AEC designed a heuristic model of commercial clean technology adoption and addressed equity in the MassBEST model in response to the input of Massachusetts agency staff.


Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Sagal-Alisalad, Joshua-Castigliego, Bryndis-Woods, Tanya-Stasio, Elizabeth A. Stanton, Jordan Burt, Elisabeth Seliga
Wednesday 08.19.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Testimony on Wisconsin Electric and Wisconsin Gas 2026 Rate Case

Client: Walnut Way Conservation Corporation

Author: Elizabeth A Stanton, PhD

August 2026

On behalf of Walnut Way Conservation Corp., Principal Economist Dr. Elizabeth A. Stanton prepared expert testimony before the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin in response to the Joint Application filed by Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Wisconsin Electric) and Wisconsin Gas LLC (Wisconsin Gas) (collectively, the “Joint Applicants”) seeking authority to increase electric, natural gas, and steam rates in Docket No. 5-UR-112. Dr. Stanton's testimony (1) evaluates the customer affordability impacts of the Joint Application, with a particular focus on household energy burden and the effect of proposed rate increases on Wisconsin Electric and Wisconsin Gas customers; (2) assesses whether the Joint Applicants have adequately accounted for customer affordability and equity considerations; and (3) provides recommendations for the Commission’s consideration.

Link to Testimony


Return to Our Work

tags: Elizabeth A. Stanton, Electricity system planning, Energy affordability, Disparity Analysis, Consumer/ratepayer impact analysis, Social equity and vulnerability analysis, Liz-Stanton
categories: Utilities, Equity Analysis, Wisconsin
Monday 08.10.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

New Hampshire Energy Burden Assessment

Client: 350 New Hampshire

Authors:
Jordan Burt, PhD, Tanya Stasio, PhD, Elisabeth Seliga, and Elizabeth A Stanton, PhD

July 2026

On behalf of 350 New Hampshire, Researcher Jordan Burt, PhD, Senior Researcher Tanya Stasio, PhD, Assistant Researcher Elisabeth Seliga, and Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, prepared a report that assesses disparities in energy burden across New Hampshire’s households. AEC’s analysis found that, on average, low-income household in New Hampshire spend 7 percent of their income on energy costs compared to just 3 percent for non-low-income households. In addition, AEC finds that low-income renters faced higher energy burdens on average than non-low-income renters. Informed by these findings and based on a review of existing energy programs across the country, AEC makes six recommendations to reduce energy bills and improve access to clean energy for low-income and renter households in New Hampshire.

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Energy Affordability, Jordan Burt, Tanya-Stasio, Liz-Stanton, Elisabeth Seliga
categories: Equity Analysis, Fuel Costs, New Hampshire
Friday 07.31.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Comments on Rhode Island's Draft Least Cost Procurement Standards

Client: Conservation Law Foundation (CLF)

Authors: Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD and Joshua R. Castigliego

June 2026

On behalf of Conservation Law Foundation, Principal Economist Dr. Elizabeth A. Stanton and Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego provided expert comments in Docket No. 26-15-EE on the proposed amendments to the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission's Least Cost Procurement (LCP) Standards. In their comments, Dr. Stanton and Mr. Castigliego discuss several issues pertaining to the proposed amendments, including: (i) concerns regarding changes to the definitions of Cost of Supply and Cost of Energy Efficiency or Conservation; (ii) provisions related to the Demand Side Management Investment Proposal; and (iii) additional issues raised by other stakeholders in their comments on the proposed amendments. Dr. Stanton and Mr. Castigliego recommend revisions to ensure consistency with the Rhode Island Benefit Cost Test (RI Test) framework, improve clarity and comprehensiveness of the LCP Standards, and strengthen the evaluation of demand-side management investments and their associated costs and benefits.

Link to Comments

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego
categories: Benefit-Cost Analysis
Friday 06.26.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Sierra Club Comments on the Commission's Draft Integrated Resource Planning Rule in Missouri

Client: Sierra Club

Authors: Liz Stanton, PhD and Joshua R. Castigliego

June 2026

AEC assisted Sierra Club with its submission of Comments on the Missouri Public Service Commission’s draft Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Rule in File No. EW-2026-0091. Sierra Club’s comments propose revisions to strengthen the IRP process by increasing transparency, clarifying regulatory requirements, enhancing stakeholder participation and access to information, and promoting more robust, data-driven utility planning.

Link to Comments

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego, Electric System Planning
categories: IRP
Friday 06.26.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Low-to-Moderate Income Emissions Reductions in Massachusetts: A Marginal Cost of Abatement Analysis

Client: Green Energy Consumers Alliance (GECA)

Authors:
Sagal Alisalad, Joshua R. Castigliego, Liz Stanton, PhD

May 2026

On behalf of Green Energy Consumers Alliance (GECA), Researcher Sagal Alisalad, Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego, and Principal Economist Liz Stanton, PhD, prepared a report analyzing the costs of low-to-moderate income (LMI) emissions reductions measures in Massachusetts. AEC staff assessed LMI-specific emissions reduction measures that could be implemented in Massachusetts by 2030 and developed a marginal abatement cost curve showing eight measures from lowest to highest cost. AEC’s analysis found that the eight measures would reduce emissions by 0.2 million metric tons (MMT) in 2030, about 7 percent of the 2.9 MMT needed to meet the Commonwealth’s 2030 climate targets, and that the eight measures total 2.8 MMT of lifetime CO2e reductions and have a net societal benefit, or cost savings, of $7.3 billion.

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Sagal-Alisalad, Joshua-Castigliego
Friday 05.15.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Savings from Coal to Gas Conversion: Florida’s Northside 1 and 2

Client: Sierra Club

Author:
Liz Stanton, PhD, Joshua R. Castigliego, Jordan Burt, PhD, and Bryndis Woods, PhD

April 2026

AEC-2026-04-WP-01

On behalf of Sierra Club, Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego, Researcher Jordan Burt, PhD, and Principal Analyst Bryndis Woods, PhD, prepared a white paper that investigates the potential cost savings associated with transitioning JEA’s Northside Generation Station to retire its coal-fired operations and run exclusively on natural gas. Using a simple model of annual expenses and revenues at the unit for the period 2026 to 2035, AEC compared net costs under a “business-as-usual” scenario in which the operations of recent historical years continue into the future with a “gas conversion” scenario in which full-time gas operations commence in 2030. Over the 10-year modeling period, elimination of all coal operations at Northside Units 1 and 2 result in a total savings of $122.8 million, or $51.9 million at Northside Unit 1 and $70.9 million at Unit 2. Northside Unit 1’s levelized costs fall by $11.4 per MWh and Unit 2’s by $8.5 per MWh.

A cost savings opportunity of this magnitude—approximately 12 percent reduction from current Northside 1 and 2 costs—deserves careful and transparent examination. Utility decisions regarding capital investments, maintaining aging infrastructure, and day-to-day operations must consider affordability and keep an open mind to new options for lowering costs. To achieve a successful conversion at Northside Units 1 and 2, AEC recommends that JEA conduct and publicly share a comparative analysis of its future operations (including all fixed, variable, and capital costs and financing) under current mixed fuel operations and under all gas operations. All assumptions, data, and methodologies should be fully transparent and made publicly available, and JEA’s analysis should also assess the conversion’s impact on rates and customer bills.


Link to White Paper

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego, Jordan Burt, Bryndis-Woods
Wednesday 04.22.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Savings from Coal to Gas Conversion: Florida’s Deerhaven 2

Client: Sierra Club

Author:
Liz Stanton, PhD, Joshua R. Castigliego, Jordan Burt, PhD, and Bryndis Woods, PhD

April 2026

 

AEC-2026-04-WP-02

On behalf of Sierra Club, Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego, Researcher Jordan Burt, PhD, and Principal Analyst Bryndis Woods, PhD, prepared a white paper that investigates the potential cost savings associated with transitioning Gainesville Regional Utilities’ (GRU) Deerhaven Generation Station to retire its coal-fired operations and run exclusively on natural gas. Using a simple model of annual expenses and revenues at the unit for the period 2026 to 2035, AEC compared net costs under a “business-as-usual” scenario in which the operations of recent historical years continue into the future with a “gas conversion” scenario in which full-time gas operations commence in 2030. Over the 10-year modeling period, elimination of all coal operations at Deerhaven Unit 2 results in a total savings $31.3 million (or a reduction in levelized costs of $7.4 per MWh).

A cost savings opportunity of this magnitude—approximately a 7 percent reduction from current Deerhaven Unit 2 costs—deserves careful and transparent examination. Utility decisions regarding capital investments, maintaining aging infrastructure, and day-to-day operations must consider affordability and keep an open mind to new options for lowering costs. To achieve a successful conversion at Deerhaven Unit 2, AEC recommends that GRU conduct and publicly share a comparative analysis of its future operations (including all fixed, variable, and capital costs and financing) under current mixed fuel operations and under all gas operations. All assumptions, data, and methodologies should be fully transparent and made publicly available, and GRU’s analysis should also assess the conversion’s impact on rates and customer bills.


Link to White Paper

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego, Jordan Burt, Bryndis-Woods
Wednesday 04.22.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Rhode Island Heat Pump Rate “RI Test” Report

Client: Conservation Law Foundation and Environmental Defense

Author:
Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Joshua R. Castigliego, and Jordan Burt, PhD

April 2026

On behalf of Conservation Law Foundation and Environmental Defense, Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego, and Researcher Jordan Burt, PhD, prepared a report assessing the results of a “Rhode Island Benefit Cost Test” (RI Test) cost-benefit analysis comparing the monetized costs and benefits of a new heat pump electric rate proposed in Rhode Island Public Utility Commission Docket No. 25-45-GE.

AEC found that the net impact of a heat pump rate is a system-wide cost savings of $11.9 million, or benefit to cost ratio of 1.3. The proposed residential heat pump rate shows greater benefits than costs under the RI Test methodology.


Link to Report


Testimony on the Proposed Rhode Island Residential Heat Pump Rate

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego, Jordan Burt
Wednesday 04.22.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Testimony on the Proposed Rhode Island Residential Heat Pump Rate

Client: Conservation Law Foundation and Environmental Defense

Author:
Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD 

April 2026

On behalf of the Conservation Law Foundation and Environmental Defense, Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, submitted direct testimony before the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission describing the methodology and results of the benefit-cost analysis “RI Test” performed on the proposed Rhode Island residential heat pump rate in Docket No. 25-45-GE. Dr. Stanton found that the net impact of a heat pump rate is a system-wide cost savings of $11.9 million, or benefit to cost ratio of 1.3. The proposed residential heat pump rate shows greater benefits than costs under the RI Test methodology.


Link to Direct Testimony

Rhode Island Heat Pump Rate “RI Test” Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton
Wednesday 04.22.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Background Report: Evaluation of Connecticut Medical Protections

Client: Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority

Authors:
Tanya Stasio, PhD, Sagal Alisalad, Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Jordan Burt, PhD, Joshua R. Castigliego, and Bryndis Woods, PhD 

March 2026

On behalf of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, Senior Researcher Tanya Stasio, PhD, Researcher Sagal Alisalad, Principal Economist Liz Stanton, PhD, and AEC staff prepared a background report that evaluates Connecticut's electric and gas utility shutoff policies for medically protected customers. Most of Connecticut's medically protected customers have year-round shutoff protection and, as a result, maintain average arrearages that are thousands of dollars more than customers without medical protections. While limiting shutoff protections may increase utility revenues and reduce ratepayer costs, AEC finds that introducing payment or financial hardship requirements to Connecticut shutoff protections for medically protected customers could cost the State of Connecticut millions by way of increased need for social services. 

This report was included as an Appendix to Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority's Report to the General Assembly Regarding the Evaluation of Medical Protection available here.

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Tanya-Stasio, Sagal-Alisalad, Liz-Stanton, Jordan Burt, Joshua-Castigliego, Bryndis-Woods
Thursday 03.19.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Risks of New Gas-Fired Generation in Arizona

Client: Western Resource Advocates (WRA)

Authors:
Bryndis Woods, PhD, Elisabeth Seliga, Alicia Zhang, Brady Dye, and Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD

February 2026

On behalf of Western Resource Advocates (WRA), a new AEC report assesses the risks associated with new gas-fired electric generation in Arizona.

The report finds that Arizona’s electric sector is dominated by gas-fired resources and much more gas-fired capacity is currently proposed. Arizona’s utilities claim that new gas-fired generation is needed to address reliability challenges and meet anticipated growth in electric demand. However, the report finds that building new gas-fired generation hurts reliability and exposes Arizona’s residents and ratepayers to six serious risks: 1) More gas generation means higher electric bills; 2) Overreliance on gas-fired generation; 3) High electric bills due to high gas prices; 4) Gas pipelines and storage constraints; 5) Growing electric demand; and 6) Human health and safety impacts.

The report concludes that, rather than furthering reliance on gas, Arizona’s utilities should instead prioritize resources that stand to benefit the state’s residents and ratepayers. Solar, wind, battery storage, energy efficiency, and demand-side management resources lower costs, diversify Arizona’s energy mix, are not reliant on fuel supply, and reduce pollution.

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Bryndis-Woods, Elisabeth Seliga, Alicia-Zhang, Brady-Dye, Liz-Stanton
Friday 02.06.26
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Testimony on Entergy Arkansas’ Request for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need

Client: Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. (AEEC)

Authors:
Liz Stanton, PhD

September 2025

On behalf of Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers, Inc. (AEEC), Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD submitted direct testimony before the Arkansas Public Service Commission to assess Entergy Arkansas, LLC’s request for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need (“CECPN”) and a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (“CCN”) in Docket No. 25-047-U. In this case, the Company requests approval for the construction and operation of Jefferson Power Station, a 754-megawatt gas-fired combined cycle combustion turbine (“CCCT”) at its existing White Bluff site. In her testimony, Dr. Stanton reviews the Company’s need for additional generation resources, its evaluation of alternative supply-side resource options, and the adequacy of its recent request for proposal (“RFP”) process.

Dr. Stanton recommends that the Commission reject the application for a CECPN as incomplete and require Entergy Arkansas to: reapply with all the information necessary to provide clear evidence that it requires additional capacity and/or generation at this time, and that the Jefferson Power Station represents the least-cost option; provide supplemental materials supporting the need for the project; conduct an all-resource RFP and make its results available to stakeholders; present cost and feasibility comparisons of resources not sited at White Bluff and resources other than natural gas-fired combined cycle combustion turbines. She also recommends that the Commission request that the Arkansas State Legislature reconsider its imposition of a six-month timeframe for CECPN cases.

Link to Testimony

Link to Surrebuttal

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton
Friday 09.12.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Equity Advisory Working Group Recommendations: Equity Metrics for the District of Columbia's Benefit-Cost Analysis Model and Stakeholder Engagement for Utility Planning

Client: Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (DC PSC)

Authors:
Bryndis Woods, PhD, Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, Sagal Alisalad, Alicia Zhang, Jordan Burt, PhD, and Elisabeth Seliga

July 2025

On behalf of the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (DC PSC), AEC—together with our partner Visionary Leadership Group—convened and facilitated a seventeen-member Equity Advisory Working Group (EAWG) to recommend: 1) Criteria for designating Priority Populations in the District; 2) Racial equity, energy burden, and low- and moderate-income metrics for inclusion in the District’s evaluation framework for utility proposals; and 3) A stakeholder accountability process to facilitate local resident engagement and representation in utility proposal decision-making processes. EAWG members attended 10 meetings between January and May 2025. At each meeting, EAWG members were given presentations and supporting materials developed by AEC to ensure that all EAWG members had the information they required to make their recommendations, such as how BCAs work for proposed utility programs, or examples of  equity metrics from the publicly available literature. AEC was also responsive to requests from EAWG members, such as by designing and modifying priority population definitions, providing equity metric methods and data, and presenting map visualizations of how different priority population definitions capture different District communities. The report presents the EAWG’s 29 recommendations which—if adopted—will help ensure that social and racial equity are included in electric and gas utility planning processes and that the disproportionate and systemic harms related to the current energy system, climate change, and environmental injustice are considered and addressed for all District communities.

Errata: On page 55 of the report, it states that "15 percent of DC households are classified as low income." This should read "19 percent of DC households are classified as low income." On page 57 of the report, it state that "The District’s moderate-income households make more than $32,000 but less than $88,000—a group that includes 25 percent of households District-wide." This should read "The District’s moderate-income households make more than $32,000 but less than $88,000—a group that includes 32 percent of households District-wide."

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Bryndis-Woods, Sagal-Alisalad, Jordan Burt, Elisabeth Seliga, Alicia-Zhang, Liz-Stanton
Thursday 07.31.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Amicus Curiae in the Case of Genesis B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Author: Liz Stanton, PhD

July 2025

Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton led AEC Staff in drafting an amicus curiae brief submitted on appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:23-cv-10345, in the case of Genesis B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Genesis plaintiffs (a group of 18 youths) argued that the EPA violated their right to equal protection of the law through discriminatory discounting of children’s lives when making environmental decisions.

In the brief, the amici curiae contend that discounting practices used by the EPA are detrimental to children and future generations, and that the dismissal of the case “reflects fundamental misunderstandings of the economics of discounting.” The Plaintiffs’ amended complaint challenged the EPA’s policy of positive social discounting, which privileges current adults while giving less weight to today’s children that will be affected by the harms of today’s environmental policies in the future. The brief concludes that the EPA’s current analyses do not give full weight to the long-term benefits of pollution reduction policies enacted now and advises the Court to reverse the District Court’s dismissal.

Signatories to the amicus curiae brief: Dr. Elizabeth A. Stanton, Dr. Eban Goodstein, Dr. Robin Hahnel, Dr. James K. Boyce, Dr. Gerald Epstein, Dr. Michael Ash, Dr. Bryndís Woods, Dr. Jordan Burt, and Dr. Tanya Stasio.

Link to Brief

News:
Economists, physicians and legal scholars back kids climate lawsuit

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Bryndis-Woods, Jordan Burt, Tanya-Stasio
Friday 07.25.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Testimony on LG&E-KU’s Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Site Compatibility Certificates

Client: Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Kentucky Solar Energy Society, Metropolitan Housing Coalition, and Mountain Association

Authors: Liz Stanton, PhD

June 2025

Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, submitted direct testimony before the Kentucky Public Service Commission to assess the load forecasting assumptions utilized in the 2025 request for approval for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) filed by Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (LG&E-KU) in Kentucky PSC Case No. 2025-00045. In her testimony, Dr. Stanton reviews the Companies’ 2025 CPCN Load Forecast and assesses the methodology, assumptions, and findings of their economic development growth forecast, particularly as they related to projected growth in data centers.

Dr. Stanton recommends that the Companies employ a short-term forecast of new data center and other large customer load based on concrete evidence that there is a high likelihood that such load will actually come online, while discounting or excluding possible large customer load that is merely speculative or has a low likelihood of materializing, and presents an alternative framework for using probability weighting to forecast future load growth from data centers.

Link to Testimony

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton
Wednesday 06.18.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Identifying Priority Areas for Clean Energy Expansion and Emissions Reduction Opportunities

Authors: Tanya Stasio, PhD, Elisabeth Seliga, Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD

April 2025

Senior Researcher Tanya Stasio, PhD, Assistant Researcher Elisabeth Seliga, and Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, prepared a white paper that provides energy, economic, environmental, and equity criteria that can be used by states, regional organizations, or other entities to identify priority areas for clean energy expansion and emissions reduction efforts within a particular jurisdiction. In addition to providing a pathway for identifying efficient and equitable locations for clean energy expansion efforts, these criteria may be helpful for prioritizing efforts to secure funding to support clean energy projects.

Link to White Paper

Link to Workbook Template

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Elisabeth Seliga, Tanya-Stasio
Thursday 04.17.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

LG&E-KU’s 2024 Integrated Resource Plan: An Assessment

Client: Mountain Association (MA), Kentuckians for the Commonwealth (KFTC), Kentucky Solar Energy Society (KYSES), and Metropolitan Housing Coalition (MHC)

Authors: Joshua R. Castigliego, Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD

March 2025

On behalf of the Mountain Association (MA), Kentuckians for the Commonwealth (KFTC), Kentucky Solar Energy Society (KYSES), and Metropolitan Housing Coalition (MHC) (collectively, the “Joint Intervenors”), Senior Researcher Joshua R. Castigliego and Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD prepared a white paper that sets out best practices for IRP modeling and reporting, and assesses the Louisville Gas and Electric Company (LG&E) and Kentucky Utilities Company (KU) (collectively, LG&E-KU) 2024 IRP filed on October 18, 2024 in Case No. 2024-00326 based on those criteria.

AEC’s best practices are organized into five categories: (A) Demand-Side Analysis; (B) Supply-Side Analysis; (C) Modeling Structure; (D) Selection of Recommended Plan; and (E) Stakeholder Input. Through its best-practices assessment, AEC finds that LG&E-KU’s 2024 IRP is missing critical components and includes errors in forecasting key assumptions, resulting in an overall flawed least-cost resource plan selection. LG&E-KU’s failure to follow IRP best practices results in resource decisions that are not properly informed (or justified) by comprehensive IRP modeling, leading to possible adverse effects on ratepayers. In particular, the flawed IRP findings may result in support for uneconomic resource additions in near-term CPCN applications.

Link to White Paper

Link to Joint Intervenors’ Comments

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Joshua-Castigliego
Tuesday 03.11.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

Testimony on East Kentucky Power Cooperative Certificates of Public Convenience and Need

Client: Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, and Mountain Association

Authors: Liz Stanton, PhD

February 2025

Principal Economist Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD, submitted direct testimony before the Kentucky Public Service Commission (“the Commission”) in response to the 2024 request for approval of Certificates of Public Convenience and Need (“CPCN”) filed by East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. (“EKPC”). In her testimony, Dr. Stanton assesses EKPC’s: annual and peak customer demand forecasts, with a focus on its Winter Peak; alternative supply resource options; modeling and resource selection methods; and rate impacts. Dr. Stanton’s review finds that EKPC has not adequately supported its winter peak demand forecast, failed to provide the modeling and analytical support needed to justify the CCGT, and failed to demonstrate that the CCGT is superior to other available alternatives such as battery storage, demand response, or peaking resources.

Link to Testimony

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton
Friday 02.21.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 

A Community Assessment of Health Impacts from the Pittsfield Generating Facility on Local Communities

Client: Massachusetts Clean Peak Coalition

Authors: Jordan Burt, Elisabeth Seliga, Tanya Stasio, PhD, Lila McNamee, and Liz Stanton, PhD

February 2025

On behalf of the Massachusetts Clean Peak Coalition Researcher Jordan Burt, Assistant Researcher Elisabeth Seliga, Researcher Tanya Stasio, PhD, Research Assistant Lila McNamee, and Principal Economist Liz Stanton, PhD, prepared a report that summarizes the negative health impacts of fossil fuel-fired emissions on communities living near the Pittsfield Generating Facility. The report identifies three key takeaways:

  1. As long as the Pittsfield Generating Facility is in operation, it has the potential to produce much higher greenhouse gas emissions and co-pollutants in any given year.

  2. EJ and other vulnerable communities live in close proximity to the Pittsfield Generating Facility, increasing vulnerability to adverse health outcomes.

  3. Replacing the fossil fuel-fired plant with clean energy resources can reduce emissions in the area.

Link to Report

Return to Our Work

tags: Liz-Stanton, Jordan Burt, Elisabeth Seliga, Tanya-Stasio, Lila McNamee
Tuesday 02.11.25
Posted by Liz Stanton
 
Newer / Older